Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellant on credit reversal for fire-destroyed goods. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that the Appellant is not obligated to reverse the credit on inputs used in producing semi-finished goods ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellant on credit reversal for fire-destroyed goods.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that the Appellant is not obligated to reverse the credit on inputs used in producing semi-finished goods destroyed in a fire. The decision relied on Rule 21 of CER, 2002 and a Gujarat High Court precedent. The impugned order was overturned, and the Appeal was granted with consequential relief.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that the Appellant is not required to reverse the credit availed on inputs used in the production of semi-finished goods destroyed in a fire. The decision was based on the applicability of Rule 21 of CER, 2002 and a previous judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.