Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a tax imposed on the first sale of goods manufactured or produced in the Province under the Madras General Sales Tax Act was a tax on the sale of goods within provincial competence or a duty of excise reserved to the Centre.
Analysis: The taxing scheme in the constitutional distribution of powers distinguished between duties of excise, which were levied on the manufacturer or producer in respect of manufacture or production, and taxes on the sale of goods, which were levied on the occasion of sale. The Court held that a first sale remains a sale taxable by the Province even if the seller is also the manufacturer or producer, because the levy is imposed on him qua seller and not qua manufacturer. The fact that the tax may economically fall upon the same person who is also subject to excise does not create legal overlap or convert the sales tax into an excise duty. Comparative foreign authorities did not justify cutting down the clear provincial power to tax sales.
Conclusion: The tax on first sales was within the provincial power to tax sales of goods and was not a duty of excise.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the constitutional allocation of fiscal powers, a tax on the sale of goods is not transformed into a duty of excise merely because the sale is the first sale made by the manufacturer or producer; the relevant inquiry is whether the levy is imposed on manufacture or on sale.