Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a debt which was within limitation on the date of presentation of the winding up petition but became time-barred before the winding up order could still be treated as a provable debt in the company's liquidation.
Analysis: The relevant provisions of the Companies Act were read together with the insolvency law by virtue of the section governing provable debts. The winding up is deemed to commence from the date of presentation of the petition, and the order operates for the benefit of all creditors as if made on a joint petition. On the analogous insolvency provisions, debts provable when the petition was filed are not defeated merely because limitation expires before the order is made. The same approach applies in company winding up, since the statutory relation-back gives effect to the petition date as the operative date for limitation purposes.
Conclusion: The debt was provable and was not barred by limitation; the claim ought to have been admitted.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the creditor's claim was directed to be entered in the list of proved debts.
Ratio Decidendi: In winding up, where the statute makes the proceeding relate back to the date of presentation of the petition, limitation is tested with reference to that date and a debt then within time remains provable even if it becomes barred before the winding up order.