Bad debt reserves and specific liability provisions excluded from surtax capital base unless shown as free reserves.

Amounts set aside for estimated bad and doubtful debts are treated as provisions, not free reserves, and are therefore excluded from capital computation for surtax liability unless they are shown to be available as reserve capital. A further sum created against specific liabilities for expenses retained its character as a provision because the underlying liabilities had not ceased; describing it as an excess provision did not convert it into a reserve. The surtax computation was upheld on that basis.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amounts standing in the reserve for bad and doubtful debts were includible in the capital computation for determining surtax liability. (ii) Whether the sum of Rs. 14,24,627 was rightly treated as provision and not reserve.

Issue (i): Whether the amounts standing in the reserve for bad and doubtful debts were includible in the capital computation for determining surtax liability.

Analysis: The amounts in question were found to represent estimated bad debts and not free reserves. No material was produced to show that they were available as reserve capital for inclusion in the capital base. Amounts set apart against anticipated bad debts, being in the nature of provision, cannot be treated as reserve for surtax computation.

Conclusion: The amounts were not includible in the capital computation. The finding was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether the sum of Rs. 14,24,627 was rightly treated as provision and not reserve.

Analysis: The amount had been created against specific liabilities for expenses and continued to retain that character in the relevant year. The factual finding that the underlying liabilities had not ceased was not displaced. A provision made for specific expenses remains provision and does not become reserve merely because it is described as excess provision.

Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 14,24,627 was correctly treated as provision and not reserve. The finding was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered entirely against the assessee, with both questions decided in favour of the Revenue and the surtax computation upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Amounts set aside against estimated or specific liabilities are provisions and not reserves, and therefore cannot be included in capital base computation for surtax unless they are shown to be free reserves.

---