Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the power to amend a plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is restricted or controlled by Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Analysis: Amendment of pleadings is intended to enable the Court to decide the real controversy between the parties and to advance substantial justice. The possibility that a plaint may be liable to rejection for want of a cause of action does not, by itself, take away the Court's power to permit amendment if the defect can be cured without injustice to the other side. Order 7 Rule 11 does not create an absolute bar against amendment; rather, amendment may prevent rejection of the plaint and avoid the need for a fresh suit where the defect is capable of being removed. The Court also noted that prior decisions relied on by the defendant were confined to their facts and did not lay down a contrary principle.
Conclusion: Order 6 Rule 17 is not restricted or controlled by Order 7 Rule 11, and the Court may allow amendment of a plaint to cure defects and avoid rejection where justice so requires.
Ratio Decidendi: The power to amend pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 is available notwithstanding Order 7 Rule 11, so long as the amendment is not impermissibly substitutive and is necessary to determine the real controversy without causing injustice.