Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the insured's claim was barred by clause 6(b)(ii) of the policy and, if so, whether the arbitral award allowing the claim was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The policy clause provided that the insurer would not be liable for loss or damage after expiry of 12 months from the happening of the loss unless the claim was the subject of pending action or arbitration. The Court applied the settled position that a contractual stipulation which merely curtails the time for enforcing a right may offend Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but a clause that extinguishes the right itself if no claim is made within the stipulated time is valid. Relying on the governing Supreme Court authority, the Court held that the policy condition was of the latter kind and was binding between the parties. The respondent raised the claim only after the stipulated period had expired, and the arbitrator had also failed to return any finding on the limitation objection.
Conclusion: The claim was not entertainable under clause 6(b)(ii), and the award could not be sustained; it was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The arbitration award was annulled because the respondent's belated claim had stood extinguished under the contractual bar in the insurance policy.
Ratio Decidendi: A contractual insurance clause that extinguishes the insured's right to claim unless action is taken within a specified period is valid and enforceable, and a claim filed beyond that period is barred and cannot support an arbitral award.