Court rules income from a contingent interest in trust not accrued until event happens.

The court held that the assessee had a contingent interest in the trust, and no income had accrued until the contingent event of marriage occurred. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to delete the addition of Rs. 12,000 made by the Income-tax Officer was upheld by the High Court, emphasizing the lack of evidence to challenge the contingent nature of the interest. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that income contingent on an event does not accrue until the event happens, and affirmed that no income had accrued to the assessee due to her contingent interest in the trust.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the assessee had a contingent interest in the trust and no income accruedRs.
2. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 12,000 made by the Income-tax OfficerRs.

Analysis:
1. The case involved a trust created by the former ruler of Mewar State, where the assessee, a beneficiary, had a 1/2 share. The Income-tax Officer assessed the interest income of Rs. 12,000 credited to the assessee as assessable income. However, it was argued that the interest was contingent as it was to be accumulated until the appellant's marriage, at which point the amount would be paid to her. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner found that the appellant had only a contingent interest and no income had accrued to her until the contingent event of marriage occurred. The Gujarat High Court precedent supported this view, stating that income contingent on an event does not accrue until the event happens. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld this position, noting the lack of evidence produced by the Revenue to rebut the contingent nature of the interest.

2. The High Court, after considering the facts and legal precedents, affirmed the Tribunal's decision that the assessee had only a contingent interest in the trust, and no income had accrued to her. The court emphasized that without evidence to the contrary, the finding of a contingent interest could not be disturbed. As the Revenue failed to provide evidence to challenge the contingent nature of the interest, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 12,000 made by the Income-tax Officer. Therefore, the court answered the reference in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, upholding the decision that no income had accrued to the assessee due to her contingent interest in the trust.

---