Tribunal grants partial appeal, adds income to total but allows exclusion next year to avoid double taxation. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the addition of Rs. 1,71,40,163 to the total income but limited it to the income part embedded in the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal grants partial appeal, adds income to total but allows exclusion next year to avoid double taxation.
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the addition of Rs. 1,71,40,163 to the total income but limited it to the income part embedded in the gross receipts. The assessee was granted the opportunity to seek exclusion of this amount from taxation in the subsequent year to prevent double taxation.
Issues: Appeal against addition to total income.
Analysis: The assessee appealed against the addition of Rs. 1,71,40,163 to their total income. The case involved the assessee, an individual engaged in civil construction consultancy business. The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed a difference in receipts shown by the assessee in the profit & loss account compared to TDS details. The AO confronted the assessee regarding this difference, to which the assessee explained ongoing disputes with the Municipal Corporation affecting the income booking. The AO, however, was not satisfied with the explanation and made the addition to the total income.
On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] confirmed the addition but noted that the assessee could apply before the AO in the next assessment year to avoid double taxation. The CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the AO, emphasizing the requirement for the appellant to include all receipts/income received or accrued in the relevant financial year itself.
During the appeal process, the assessee contended that the receipts were accounted for in the next year when payments were confirmed by the municipality. The assessee argued that only the income embedded in the gross receipts should be considered for addition. The Tribunal considered the contentions and ruled that the income part involved in the gross receipts should be added to the total income. The Tribunal acknowledged that the assessee might have incurred expenditure in earning the gross receipts, thus confirming the addition to the extent of 1.96% of the difference, amounting to Rs. 1,71,40,163. The Tribunal allowed the assessee to approach the AO in the next year to exclude this amount from taxation to avoid double taxation.
In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the addition to the total income but limiting it to the income part embedded in the gross receipts. The assessee was granted the opportunity to seek exclusion of this amount from taxation in the subsequent year to prevent double taxation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
