Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents could recover and adjust liquidated damages from the petitioner's other contracts before adjudication of liability by the competent adjudicatory forum.
Analysis: The contract provided a dispute redressal mechanism, but the present challenge was to the unilateral recovery of penalty and liquidated damages without prior adjudication. Under Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, compensation for breach is payable as reasonable compensation for loss actually suffered or for a genuine pre-estimate of damages, and a claim for damages does not become a present debt until liability is determined and damages are assessed by a court or other adjudicatory authority. Liquidated damages may dispense with strict proof of actual loss, but they do not authorize recovery in the absence of judicial or quasi-judicial determination that loss or legal injury has been suffered and that the stipulated sum is enforceable as reasonable compensation.
Conclusion: The respondents could not recover the alleged liquidated damages from other contracts without prior adjudication of liability, and the impugned communication was unsustainable.