Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of amalgamation could be sanctioned in the absence of prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India, in view of the Tribunal's concerns that the transferee company was carrying on or was required to be registered as a non-banking financial company.
Analysis: The petition arose from a scheme of amalgamation transferred to the Tribunal for consideration under the compromise and arrangement provisions. Although the statutory authorities raised no objection to the scheme in principle, the Regional Director reported that the transferee company's financial profile prima facie indicated NBFC characteristics, and that prior written permission of the Reserve Bank of India was required for any scheme involving transfer of control under the applicable RBI directions. The Tribunal also received a response from the Reserve Bank of India stating that the transferee company was carrying on NBFC activities without permission. In these circumstances, the Tribunal held that it could not proceed in aid of an illegality or sanction the scheme without the requisite RBI approval.
Conclusion: The scheme of amalgamation could not be sanctioned without prior RBI approval and the petition was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: A scheme of amalgamation involving a company carrying on or prima facie required to be registered as an NBFC cannot be sanctioned unless the mandatory prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India has been obtained.