Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Gujarat Government was competent to prescribe passing of the G.D.C. & A. examination as a qualification for promotion of the allotted government servants, and whether such prescription was hit by section 81(6) of the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960.
Analysis: The relevant pre-existing conditions of service included not only the rules then in force but also the liability to be governed by valid future rules made by the reorganised State in matters of promotion. The protection under section 81(6) was read in the light of the earlier arrangement under section 115(7) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, and the Central Government's approval operated as law within the meaning of section 2(d) and section 87 of the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960. On that basis, the State of Gujarat inherited the power to regulate promotional qualifications and could validly require the G.D.C. & A. examination.
Conclusion: The prescription of G.D.C. & A. as a qualification for promotion was valid and not contrary to section 81(6) of the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the High Court's judgment was set aside, while the direction that no recovery be made was left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the successor State is empowered by the applicable reorganisation law and the pre-existing service regime, it may validly alter promotional qualifications without offending the statutory protection against variation to the employee's disadvantage.