Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether directions were required to ensure expeditious consideration of the petitioner's application under Section 17 and to restrain confirmation of the auction until such application was decided.
Analysis: The application under Section 17 was already pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal and notice had been issued for a date after the scheduled auction. In view of the apprehension that the statutory remedy might become ineffective if the auction was confirmed before adjudication, the Court found it appropriate to protect the petitioner's remedy by requiring prompt disposal of the application. The Court also directed that the secured creditors should not confirm the auction until the Tribunal decided the application.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted protective relief, and the Tribunal was directed to decide the Section 17 application expeditiously while the auction was not to be confirmed meanwhile.