Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cream separator machinery was covered by Serial No. 3(vi) of List 32A in Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. dated 1-3-2002 so as to entitle the appellant to refund of duty paid.
Analysis: The relevant entry in List 32A specifically covered "latex centrifuge testing" under Tariff Item 8421 1100. The machinery purchased by the appellant was a cream separator machine. The entry referred to testing equipment, whereas the imported/purchased machine was used in processing of rubber. The two machines were held to be entirely different in nature and function and could not be treated as the same goods for the purpose of exemption.
Conclusion: The cream separator machine was not covered by Serial No. 3(vi) of List 32A, and the denial of refund was . The appeal was therefore decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be applied to the goods specifically covered by the relevant entry, and a machine cannot claim exemption merely because it is commercially or functionally related to the described item if the entry identifies a different apparatus.