Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether appeals and the special leave petition concerning block assessments in search cases and the jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission survived in view of the CBDT instruction clarifying the meaning of "case" under section 245A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The instruction clarified that the expression "case" under section 245A(b) includes block assessments to be made in search cases and stated that pending special leave petitions before the Supreme Court would be withdrawn. The order records that similar matters had already been withdrawn and that the pending matters must meet the same fate.
Conclusion: The appeals and the special leave petition were dismissed, and the connected civil appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
Final Conclusion: The pending matters did not survive after the departmental instruction, resulting in dismissal of the appeals and withdrawal of the connected civil appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the departmental instruction expressly clarifies the statutory expression governing the controversy and directs withdrawal of pending matters, the pending appeals may be disposed of consistently with that clarification.