Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest awarded by the High Court on enhanced compensation for requisitioned property was assessable as income from other sources or was to be treated as an ex gratia payment by way of compensation.
Analysis: The assessment related to compensation payable for requisition, not acquisition, of property. The assessee was to receive periodic compensation under the requisition law, and the High Court enhanced that compensation while also directing payment termed as interest on the enhanced amount. The statutory scheme contained no provision for interest on delayed compensation and there was no contractual basis for such payment. However, the decisive factor was the character of the underlying receipt: the monthly compensation itself was of revenue nature, and the interest awarded on the enhanced compensation could not assume a different character merely because it was described as interest. There was no finding that the amount represented damages.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 21,295 was taxable as income from other sources and was not an ex gratia capital receipt; the question was answered in the negative and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the principal receipt is revenue in nature, an additional sum awarded as interest on enhanced compensation for requisition does not change its character into a capital receipt unless it is shown to be damages or some other non-revenue payment.