TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed for delay & non-compliance with deposit order. Compliance with Sec.25F emphasized.</h1> <h3>RONIX POLYMER PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA-II COMMISSIONERATE</h3> The SC dismissed the appeal due to limitation, rejecting the prayer for condonation of delay. The appellant failed to comply with the order to pre-deposit ... - Issues involved: Appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation and prayer for condonation of delay rejected.Summary:The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation, with the prayer for condonation of delay being rejected. The order under challenge dated 22nd December, 2000, required the appellant to pre-deposit a sum of &8377; 32,56,079.43p. The appellant failed to appear before the appellate authority on multiple hearing dates. The order was passed citing non-compliance with the provisions of Sec.25F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant's counsel argued that no peremptory order was issued for the deposit, leading to a violation of natural justice. Despite this argument, the appellant had avoided payment for over 12 years. The Court ordered that if the appellant deposits the specified sum within three months, the appeal will be heard on merits. The appellant can utilize the amount in their CENVAT Account towards the deposit. Failure to make the deposit within the stipulated time will result in the dismissal of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
