Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Scope of the interim stay operating against further proceedings pursuant to the provisional attachment order, and whether the period of stay was to be excluded for the purpose of the 180-day limit under section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Analysis: The clarification made it explicit that the earlier restraint covered all further proceedings pursuant to the provisional attachment order, including proceedings under section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 for confirmation of the attachment. At the same time, it preserved the subsistence of the attachment itself and clarified that the period during which the interim stay operated would not count towards the statutory 180-day period under section 5(1).
Outcome: The interim order was clarified accordingly, the attachment continued, and the clarification application was disposed of.