Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had taken or enticed the minor girl out of the keeping of her lawful guardian with intent that she might be seduced to illicit intercourse so as to attract Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and whether the conviction called for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The evidence of prior intimacy, repeated trips, gifts, correspondence, and the appellant's earlier conduct provided the background for the girl's leaving her parental home. The Court accepted that the minor had not gone to the appellant entirely uninfluenced by his earlier persuasion and allurement. It held that for the purpose of kidnapping from lawful guardianship, the minor's consent is immaterial and that actual physical force is not necessary where inducement or encouragement has operated on the mind of the minor. The Court further held that the facts established earlier solicitation and participation in forming the minor's intention to leave her guardian's custody, bringing the case within the scope of Section 366. No cogent ground was shown for disturbing the concurrent findings of fact.
Conclusion: The conviction under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was upheld and the prayer for interference was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the accused, by prior inducement or allurement, has materially influenced a minor to leave the lawful guardian's keeping with intent to facilitate illicit intercourse, the offence under Section 366 is made out even if the minor later acts voluntarily in appearance and even without physical force.