TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed for non-compliance with stay order requirements.</h1> <h3>BPL-BBC Joint Venture Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II</h3> The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai due to the appellants' failure to comply with the stay order requiring a pre-deposit and ... Stay of Pre-deposit - non-compliance - Held that: - the compliance was to be reported on 02/02/2015 and various adjournments were given on this ground only as to that the appeals are pending before the Hon’ble High Court. No stay order has been produced before us staying the operation of our order directing the appellants to deposit the amount - since there is no compliance with our stay order, we dismiss the appeal for non-compliance. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with the stay order directing for pre-deposit. The appellants failed to produce a stay order from the High Court, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
