Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the surplus arising from purchase and encashment of bank deposit receipts used to discharge the assessee's overdraft liability constituted business income assessable under section 10, and whether it could be excluded as a casual and non-recurring receipt.
Analysis: The transaction was treated as a purchase of valuable rights followed by their encashment at a higher value for the purpose of reducing the assessee's liability. Such activity fell within the enlarged meaning of business, which includes trade and transactions in the nature of trade. The receipt was therefore regarded as profit arising from business. Once the amount was held to be business income, the plea that it was casual and non-recurring did not assist the assessee, because the statutory exception was inapplicable to business receipts. Authorities dealing with mere remission by a creditor were distinguished, as there was no remission here and the advantage arose from independent purchase transactions.
Conclusion: The surplus of Rs. 16,995 was assessable as profit from business under section 10 of the Income-tax Act and the question was answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A surplus earned by purchasing and realising valuable rights for the purpose of discharging a liability is business profit if the transaction amounts to trade, and it is not excluded as a casual receipt once it is found to arise from business.