Appeal dismissed on Income Tax Tribunal's order for Assessment Year 2004-05.

The appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order for Assessment Year 2004-05 was dismissed. The court upheld the Tribunal's decisions regarding the deletion of addition under section 41(1), exclusion of deduction under section 80IB, and inclusion of interest on delayed payments as income for working out deduction under section 80IB. The court found that the issues had been previously settled in favor of the Respondent assessee and did not raise any substantial questions of law. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

---

---

Issues:
1. Challenge to the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) for Assessment Year 2004-05.
2. Questions of law raised by the Revenue:
(i) Deletion of addition made under section 41(1).
(ii) Exclusion of deduction under section 80IB for determining deduction under section 80HHC.
(iii) Inclusion of interest on delayed payments as income of the unit for working out deduction under section 80IB.

Analysis:

1. Deletion of addition under section 41(1):
- The issue was concluded by a previous court decision in favor of the Respondent assessee, hence not entertained as it did not raise any substantial question of law.

2. Exclusion of deduction under section 80IB:
- The Tribunal's decision was based on a previous court ruling and the issue was still binding despite being referred to the Supreme Court for further consideration. The question was not entertained as it did not give rise to any substantial question of law.

3. Inclusion of interest on delayed payments under section 80IB:
- The Tribunal allowed the Respondent assessee's appeal based on a previous order for the Assessment Year 2000-01. The Revenue argued against this decision, citing an appeal that was dismissed due to low tax effect. However, the court referred to a judgment in a similar case where interest received was considered part of the sale price and satisfied the requirements of Section 80IB. The issue was concluded by a previous court decision in favor of the Respondent assessee, and hence, did not raise any substantial question of law.

Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

---