Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on tyres used in Low Profile Dump Trucks deployed in captive mines; (ii) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on spares of Ventra Locomotives used in captive mines.
Issue (i): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on tyres used in Low Profile Dump Trucks deployed in captive mines.
Analysis: The eligibility of credit on tyres used in the dump trucks had already been decided in the assessee's favour in its own case. No contrary decision was brought to notice.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on tyres used in Low Profile Dump Trucks was held admissible in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on spares of Ventra Locomotives used in captive mines.
Analysis: The eligibility of credit on spares of the locomotives had also been decided earlier in the assessee's favour in its own case. No contrary decision was cited.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on spares of Ventra Locomotives was held admissible in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The disallowances and demand confirmations were set aside and the assessee succeeded on both issues.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an identical credit entitlement issue has already been decided in the assessee's own case and no contrary authority is shown, the earlier decision should be followed and credit cannot be denied.