TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Trust treated as individual under Income-tax Act, exempt from tax deduction</h1> <h3>Income-Tax Officer Versus Arihant Trust And Others</h3> The court held that the trust should be treated as an individual under section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As such, the trust was exempt from the ... Failure To Deduct Tax At Source, Representative Assessee Issues Involved:1. Whether the trust should be treated as an individual for the purpose of section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Whether the trust's failure to deduct income-tax at source constitutes an offense under section 276B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Summary:Issue 1: Trust's Status as an IndividualThe primary issue was whether the trust should be treated as an individual under section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondents argued that the trust should be treated as an individual, as the assessment was made against the trust in this capacity. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate accepted this contention, relying on the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (exhibit D-1), which treated the trust as an individual for assessment purposes under section 164(1) of the Act. The Commissioner distinguished between a trust acting on the direction of beneficiaries and one acting independently as per the trust deed. The court concluded that the trust, acting as per the trust deed, should be assessed in the same manner as the individual beneficiaries it represents.Issue 2: Failure to Deduct Income-tax at SourceThe complainant, the Income-tax Officer, filed 27 complaints against the trust and its trustees for failing to deduct income-tax at source from the interest paid to the beneficiaries, alleging a violation of section 194A of the Act. The court examined whether the trust's status as an individual exempted it from this requirement. The court referred to various legal precedents and concluded that the term 'individual' in section 194A includes artificial juridical persons. Therefore, the trust, treated as an individual for assessment purposes, retains this status for the purpose of section 194A. Consequently, the trust was exempt from the requirement to deduct tax at source, and no offense was made out under section 276B of the Act.Conclusion:The court upheld the decision of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, concluding that the trust should be treated as an individual under section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As an individual is exempt from the requirement to deduct tax at source under this section, the trust and its trustees could not be prosecuted for failing to do so. All criminal revisions were dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
