1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed for Non-Appearance: Maxim 'Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt' Applies</h1> The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the appellant's non-appearance. The tribunal emphasized the maxim 'VIAILATIBUS ... Appellant-assessee is not interested to pursue the appeal - as per maxim, VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT, law helps those who are vigilant and not those who go to sleep - appeal dismissed. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal for default as the appellant did not appear, stating the maxim 'VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT,' which means law helps those who are vigilant. Cross-objections were also disposed of.