TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed for Non-Appearance: Maxim 'Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt' Applies</h1> <h3>M/s Metalman Industries Ltd. Versus CCE, Indore</h3> The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the appellant's non-appearance. The tribunal emphasized the maxim 'VIAILATIBUS ... Appellant-assessee is not interested to pursue the appeal - as per maxim, VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT, law helps those who are vigilant and not those who go to sleep - appeal dismissed. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal for default as the appellant did not appear, stating the maxim 'VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT,' which means law helps those who are vigilant. Cross-objections were also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
