Appeal Dismissed for Non-Appearance: Maxim 'Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt' Applies The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the appellant's non-appearance. The tribunal emphasized the maxim 'VIAILATIBUS ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Appearance: Maxim "Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt" Applies
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the appellant's non-appearance. The tribunal emphasized the maxim "VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT," indicating that the law assists those who are vigilant. Cross-objections were also addressed in the disposition.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal for default as the appellant did not appear, stating the maxim "VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT," which means law helps those who are vigilant. Cross-objections were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.