Insurance compensation for damaged machinery is not capital gains; section 80J computation followed binding Supreme Court precedent.

Compensation received from an insurer for partial damage to machinery was treated as indemnity for loss, not as consideration for a transfer of the asset or any rights in it; in the absence of a transfer, section 45 capital gains tax did not apply, and the assessee's contention succeeded on this point. The computation of capital employed under section 80J was upheld because it was governed by a binding Supreme Court decision on the same question, so the Revenue's position prevailed on that issue. The reference was thus disposed of by accepting the assessee's capital gains argument and rejecting the challenge to the section 80J computation.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether compensation received from an insurance company for partial damage to machinery gave rise to short-term capital gains under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the computation of capital employed under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was correctly confirmed.

Issue (i): Whether compensation received from an insurance company for partial damage to machinery gave rise to short-term capital gains under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: Compensation paid under an insurance policy for damage, loss, or destruction of property is indemnity for the insured loss and not consideration for any transfer of the property or any right in it. In the absence of a transfer, the charging provision relating to capital gains is not attracted.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee. The amount received from the insurance company did not attract capital gains tax under section 45.

Issue (ii): Whether the computation of capital employed under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was correctly confirmed.

Analysis: The computation stood concluded by the binding decision of the Supreme Court governing the same question.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by accepting the assessee's contention on the capital gains question and rejecting the challenge on the section 80J computation question.

Ratio Decidendi: Insurance compensation for damage or destruction of property is an indemnity payment and does not involve a transfer for the purposes of capital gains; where no transfer occurs, the capital gains charging provision does not apply.

---