Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imams performing religious duties in mosques are entitled to remuneration, and whether the Wakf Board and the Union of India were bound to frame and implement a scheme for payment of such remuneration.
Analysis: Mosques are wakfs and the Wakf Board exercises statutory supervision and administration over them, including control over income and application of funds for the purposes for which the wakf was created. The duty of an imam is central to the religious functioning of a mosque, and the absence of an express statutory provision treating imams as employees does not negate the practical necessity of providing them sustenance where they depend on such work for livelihood. The right to live with human dignity under Article 21 cannot be ignored on the ground that the work is religious in character. Financial constraints of the Board cannot override the claim of those who perform the principal function of community prayer in mosques.
Conclusion: Imams are entitled to remuneration, and the Wakf authorities were required to frame a scheme for payment and implement it.
Final Conclusion: The petition was allowed, and directions were issued requiring the preparation and implementation of a remuneration scheme for imams under the supervisory framework of the Wakf Boards.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory body exercises supervision over wakf property, it must ensure that the essential religious functionaries who sustain the purpose of the wakf receive remuneration necessary for a dignified existence, and financial difficulty is no answer to the enforcement of that entitlement.