Supreme Court Allows Delay in Case per 2016 Judgment The Supreme Court condoned the delay in the case as per the judgment in 2016 (2) TMI 1064 - SC Order. Legal representatives involved were Mr. Ranjit ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Allows Delay in Case per 2016 Judgment
The Supreme Court condoned the delay in the case as per the judgment in 2016 (2) TMI 1064 - SC Order. Legal representatives involved were Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Mr. Ritin Rai, Mr. Haris Beeran, Mr. P.K.Malik, Ms. Sadhvi Mohindru, Mr. B.V. Balram Das, and Mrs. An.
The Supreme Court, in a brief order, exercised its discretionary jurisdiction to allow a delayed petition, recording "Delay condoned." The order reflects the court's invocation of equitable relief from the bar of limitation, permitting adjudication of merits despite procedural lapse. No reasons are set out in the text provided beyond the condonation; the operative effect is that the petition is entertained notwithstanding the delay, thereby removing limitation as a preliminary ground for rejection and enabling substantive consideration of the claims. The order is procedural and interlocutory in character, addressing admissibility rather than the merits of the underlying controversy.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.