Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after receiving Form WW under section 63-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The order was challenged as being contrary to natural justice, with the grievance that the audit report and the filing of Form WW had not been properly considered before framing the assessment. The respondent also indicated that Form WW could be received and the matter reconsidered afresh in accordance with law. In view of these submissions and the need to examine the matter after affording an opportunity of personal hearing, the assessment was set aside and a remand was warranted.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the respondent to receive Form WW, grant personal hearing, and decide the assessment afresh on merits and in accordance with law.