Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to interest on the tax amount refunded by the department.
Analysis: The exemption already granted to the petitioner was held to be valid, and the tax amount deposited pursuant to the earlier direction was refundable. Since the department returned only the principal amount and withheld the interest component, the Court held that interest is the normal accretion on capital and that the refund had to carry interest. The Court followed its earlier decision holding that interest is payable on such refunded amounts.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to interest on the refunded tax amount, and the department was directed to pay interest at 15% per annum from the date of deposit until refund.