Rectification cannot become review: special levy regime prevails over general trade tax for molasses liability.

Rectification power under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act extends only to an apparent mistake on the record and cannot be used to review an earlier decision or re-open a debatable issue. The Tribunal therefore acted beyond jurisdiction when it altered its prior view and fastened tax liability on burnt molasses. The text also states that molasses fell within a special statutory levy framework under the U.P. Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961 and the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, so the general trade tax law could not be invoked over the same subject matter. The later order was unsustainable and was quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Trade Tax Tribunal could validly exercise rectification powers under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act to alter its earlier decision and fasten tax liability on burnt molasses, and whether the levy on molasses was excluded by the special statutory regime governing sugarcane and molasses.

Analysis: Section 22 permits rectification only of an apparent mistake on the record and does not authorise a review or a change of opinion on issues requiring detailed argument and debate. The earlier tribunal orders had held that molasses were not taxable under the U.P. Trade Tax Act in view of the special levy structure under the U.P. Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961 and the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964. The Court accepted that the administrative charges on molasses were in the nature of tax, and that when a special enactment occupies the field, the general trade tax law cannot be invoked to levy tax on the same subject matter.

Conclusion: The Tribunal acted beyond the permissible scope of section 22 in revising its earlier view and in fastening tax liability on burnt molasses; the impugned order was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The revisionist succeeded, the Tribunal's later order was quashed, and the assessee obtained relief against the disputed tax demand together with consequential interest relief as directed.

Ratio Decidendi: Rectification jurisdiction cannot be used to review or re-decide a matter on merits, and a special statutory levy prevails over the general taxing statute where both operate in the same field.

---