Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was in holding that an air-conditioning plant fixed in a bus formed an integral part of the bus, and whether depreciation on such air-conditioner was allowable at the rate applicable to the bus rather than the rate applicable to air-conditioning plants.
Analysis: The application sought a reference under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on questions already considered by a Division Bench in connected reference applications involving the same assessee. The earlier Division Bench had taken the view that where the parts form part of the motor bus, they are to be depreciated at the same rate as the motor bus. Following that view, the Court found that the proposed questions did not give rise to a referable question of law.
Conclusion: The reference application was dismissed, and the Tribunal's view on depreciation at the bus rate was left undisturbed.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in resisting the reference, and the matter was finally disposed of by dismissal of the petition.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an accessory or equipment is treated as forming part of the motor vehicle, depreciation is to be allowed at the rate applicable to the vehicle and no referable question of law arises merely because a separate depreciation rate exists for that equipment.