Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the first proviso to section 30(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, which bars appeals in respect of orders under section 46(1) unless the tax has been paid, makes payment of the tax a condition precedent to (i) the presentation of the appeal or (ii) the hearing and final disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The question requires construing the words "no appeal shall lie" in the first proviso to section 30(1) read with sub-section (2) of section 30 and section 46(1). The alternative constructions are: (i) that payment is a precondition to the very right to present an appeal, or (ii) that payment is a precondition to the appellate authority hearing and disposing of an appeal already presented. The language of sub-section (2) uses the word "presented" where the Legislature intended to regulate presentation; the proviso uses different language. Where a construction would operate to deprive an assessee altogether of the right of appeal, a construction that avoids such a denial and accords the assessee an opportunity to have the appeal heard on payment before disposal is to be preferred. The proviso, therefore, is to be read as affecting the hearing and final disposal of an appeal unless the tax has been paid, not as defeating the ability to present an appeal prior to payment.
Conclusion: Payment of the tax under the first proviso to section 30(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is a condition precedent to the hearing and disposal of an appeal against orders under section 46(1), and is not a condition precedent to the presentation of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The first proviso to section 30(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 requires tax to be paid before an appellate authority may hear and dispose of an appeal under section 46(1), but does not bar the presentation of the appeal prior to such payment.