Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal against an order imposing penalty under section 46(1) of the Income-tax Act was incompetent because the tax had not been paid on the date the appeal was presented, where payment was completed before the appeal was taken up for admission.
Analysis: The first proviso to section 30(1) barred an appeal from lying against an order under section 46(1) unless the tax had been paid, but the language did not say that the appeal could not be presented unless payment had already been made. A distinction was drawn between presentation of an appeal and its admission, and the wording of section 30(2) showed that the statute itself recognised that distinction. The reference to the word "lie" was treated as supporting admissibility in the sense of maintainability, not as fixing the date of presentation. The prescribed appeal form was held not to control the statutory condition, as non-compliance with a recital in the form could not override the Act.
Conclusion: The appeal was competent because the relevant requirement was satisfied by the time the appeal was considered for admission, and the objection that payment had not been made on the date of presentation failed.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and the appellate order treating the appeal as incompetent was set aside in principle.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute provides that no appeal shall lie unless tax has been paid, the condition governs maintainability at the stage of admission and not merely the date of presentation, unless the statute expressly says otherwise.