Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was attracted so as to deny exemption under Section 11.
Analysis: The assessee had received research and training grants along with other income. The Assessing Officer treated the latter as commercial receipts and denied exemption on the footing that the proviso to Section 2(15) applied. The Tribunal applied the principle that where the predominant activity of an is not business or commerce, exemption cannot be denied merely because some income arises from subsidiary or incidental activity. That reasoning had already been affirmed and applied in earlier decisions.
Conclusion: The proviso to Section 2(15) was not held applicable to deny the benefit of Section 11.