Tribunal Rules on Taxability of Training Fees and Consulting Engineer's Service

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the taxability of training fees under Commercial Training or Coaching Service, deeming the demand of Rs. 1,17,02,437 unsustainable due to the training qualifying as vocational training. Regarding the taxability of the amount received for the development of cost index and upgradation of cost data under Consulting Engineer's Service, the demand of Rs. 6,09,621 was considered incorrect as it would result in double taxation. However, the appellant did not have a prima facie case for the taxability of rent received from renting immovable property for commercial purposes, and was directed to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 within four weeks.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of training fees under Commercial Training or Coaching Service.
2. Taxability of amount received for development of cost index and upgradation of cost data under Consulting Engineer's Service.
3. Taxability of rent received from renting of immovable property for commercial purposes.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxability of Training Fees under Commercial Training or Coaching Service:
The appellant provided training to construction workers for skill upgradation in association with CIDC and IGNOU, collecting fees through CIDC. The Department argued that this training fee is taxable under Section 65(105)(zzc) read with Section 65(27) as Commercial Training or Coaching Service. The appellant contended that their activity is exempt under Notification No. 24/2004-S.T., dated 10-9-2004, as vocational training. The Tribunal noted that during the dispute period, the definition of "commercial training or coaching centre" excluded institutes issuing certificates recognized by law. Since the training resulted in certificates recognized by IGNOU, the appellant's training did not fall under the taxable category of commercial training or coaching centre. Furthermore, the Tribunal found that the training qualifies as vocational training, exempt under Notification No. 24/2004-S.T. Hence, the demand of Rs. 1,17,02,437/- was deemed unsustainable.

2. Taxability of Amount Received for Development of Cost Index and Upgradation of Cost Data under Consulting Engineer's Service:
The appellant received 90% of the amount from CIDC, which had an agreement with ONGC for developing cost index and upgradation of cost data. CIDC paid service tax on the full amount received from ONGC. The Department demanded service tax from the appellant on the amount received from CIDC. The Tribunal held that since CIDC already paid service tax on the full amount, charging the appellant again would result in double taxation. Thus, the demand of Rs. 6,09,621/- was considered incorrect, and the appellant had a prima facie case in their favor.

3. Taxability of Rent Received from Renting of Immovable Property for Commercial Purposes:
The appellant received Rs. 4,04,540/- as rent for commercial property but did not pay service tax of Rs. 41,668/-. The appellant argued that the property was not owned by them and was sublet. The Tribunal held that the subletting for commercial purposes attracts service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzz) read with Section 65(90a), regardless of ownership. Therefore, the appellant did not have a prima facie case for this demand.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- within four weeks and reported compliance by 30-7-2014. Upon compliance, the requirement for pre-deposit of the remaining service tax demand, interest, and penalty would be waived, and recovery stayed. The stay application was disposed of accordingly.

Pronouncement:
The judgment was pronounced in the open Court on 22-8-2014.

---