Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight could be included in the taxable turnover of the petitioners while proceeding under Section 21 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, when the freight was not charged by the petitioners in the sale bill and was paid directly by the allottees.
Analysis: The factual position that the petitioners raised bills only for ex-colliery price, taxes and handling charges, and that freight was neither paid to them nor charged by them from the allottees, was undisputed. On those facts, freight did not form part of the petitioners' turnover. The inclusion of freight in taxable turnover could arise only if it formed part of the sale bill or was charged by the dealer as part of the sale consideration. The authorities relied on by the revenue were distinguished because they concerned expenditure incurred by the dealer as part of the price structure, whereas here the freight was borne directly by the purchasers. The principle recognised in the cited Supreme Court decision was that freight separately charged, and not included in the bill of sale price, cannot be brought into the turnover of the dealer.
Conclusion: Freight could not be included in the taxable turnover of the petitioners, and the notices and consequential orders under Section 21 were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Freight not charged by the dealer in the sale bill and paid directly by the purchaser does not form part of the dealer's taxable turnover under the sales tax law.