Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the commission paid to the general manager was deductible as business expenditure, and whether the allowance was to be judged under the provision dealing specifically with commission or under the residuary business expenditure provision.
Analysis: Commission paid to an employee was held to fall within the specific provision dealing with commission, whether contractual or voluntary, and the general residuary provision did not exclude consideration of such payment altogether on the facts of the case. Even under the residuary provision, the assessee had the burden of proving that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business. The Court held that reasonableness, the qualifications and services of the employee, the practice in the trade, the quantum paid, and the surrounding commercial circumstances were relevant factors in testing whether the expenditure was genuinely incurred for business purposes. On the evidence, the authorities were justified in holding that the assessee had not proved that the whole of the commission was incurred wholly and exclusively for business.
Conclusion: The commission was not fully allowable as business expenditure. The disallowance was upheld and the answer was against the assessee.