TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether interest credited through head-office and branch book adjustments could be deemed to have been received in British India and taxed as income received there. (ii) Whether expenditure incurred in connection with criminal litigation was an admissible deduction as business expenditure.
Issue (i): Whether interest credited through head-office and branch book adjustments could be deemed to have been received in British India and taxed as income received there.
Analysis: The assessee maintained mercantile accounts with regular transfer entries between the business centres, and the books showed that the liability of the branch was extinguished to the extent of the interest credited to the head office. On those facts, the credited amount was treated as having come to the assessee in British India. The distinction between mere accrual and receipt did not assist the assessee because the entries and adjustments showed receipt in the relevant territory.
Conclusion: The amount was deemed to have been received in British India and was liable to tax. The finding was against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether expenditure incurred in connection with criminal litigation was an admissible deduction as business expenditure.
Analysis: For deduction, the expenditure had to be shown not merely to arise in the course of business, but to be laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business. The record contained no material showing that the criminal litigation expense was incidental to the business or incurred for the purpose of earning business profits. In the absence of such material, the claim could not satisfy the statutory test.
Conclusion: The expenditure was not an admissible deduction under the business expenditure provision. The finding was against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered with the first question decided in favour of the Revenue and the second against the assessee, with costs awarded to the Department.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts credited through regular book adjustments may be treated as received in British India where the accounts show extinguishment of liability and effective receipt through the business structure, while deductions are allowable only for expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business.
TaxTMI 
