Question of law absent where an earlier tribunal precedent squarely governed the appeal and sustained dismissal.

Where the appeal was already covered by an earlier tribunal ruling, the HC held that no independent question of law survived for consideration. The court examined the disputed issue against the binding precedent relied upon by the adjudicating forum and found the appeal squarely governed by that prior decision. On that basis, the dismissal of the appeal was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal raised any question of law when the point was already covered by an earlier tribunal decision.

Analysis: The appeal was examined in the light of the earlier tribunal ruling relied upon by the adjudicating forum. The Court found that the issue stood squarely covered by that precedent and that no independent question of law survived for consideration.

Conclusion: No question of law arose in the appeal, and the dismissal of the appeal was sustained.

---