Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether any referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order upholding deletion of the disallowance of expenditure on social overheads.
Analysis: The dispute concerned disallowance of expenditure of Rs. 24,15,515 claimed towards social overheads. The appellate authority had allowed the expenditure and the Tribunal affirmed that view. On the facts found, the disallowance turned on appreciation of facts rather than on any legal principle, and no question of law was shown to arise for reference under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: No referable question of law arose. The request for reference was rightly refused.