Questions of law on penalty findings and inaccurate particulars accepted for reference under income-tax law.

Questions 3 and 4 were treated as questions of law fit for reference under section 256(2) because they concerned whether penalty was sustained merely on the assessment order without full consideration of the facts and legal position, and whether there was a clear finding on furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Court accepted these issues as arguable legal questions and directed the Tribunal to draw up a statement of the case and refer them to the High Court. The remaining proposed questions were not accepted for reference.

---

---

Issues: Whether the questions proposed at serial numbers 3 and 4 constituted questions of law fit to be referred to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: On examining the Tribunal's order and the surrounding factual matrix, the Court found that the third question, concerning confirmation of penalty on the basis of the assessment order without considering the full facts and legal position, and the fourth question, concerning absence of a clear finding on furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, did raise arguable legal issues. The remaining questions were not accepted for reference.

Conclusion: Questions nos. 3 and 4 were held to be questions of law and the Tribunal was directed to draw up a statement of the case and refer them to the High Court.

---