Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order and consequential demand notice were vitiated for denial of reasonable opportunity and violation of the principles of natural justice.
Analysis: The reassessment was made under section 39(1) read with sections 36(1) and 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, after notice under section 52 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with rule 35 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules. The assessee had sought time to furnish records and objections, but the authority proceeded to pass the reassessment order without allowing a fair opportunity. In tax matters, before fastening liability, the authority must afford reasonable opportunity to explain and produce materials, and a hurried refusal to grant time can render the action arbitrary.
Conclusion: The reassessment order and the consequential demand notice were quashed for breach of natural justice, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after giving the assessee an opportunity to appear and produce records.