Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue appeals were liable to be dismissed under the litigation policy on the ground of the monetary limit prescribed by the Board.
Analysis: The appeals consisted of four separate matters, each involving an amount below the then-applicable monetary threshold. The aggregate amount was also considered, but the revised Board instruction dated 17-12-2015 enhanced the monetary limit to Rs. 10 lakhs for filing appeals, and the total amount involved remained below that revised limit. The prior Board circular on litigation policy was relied upon to determine the maintainability of the appeals.
Conclusion: The Revenue appeals were not maintainable under the litigation policy and were dismissed without examination of the merits.
Final Conclusion: The dispute was disposed of at the threshold on account of the applicable monetary limit under the Board's litigation policy.
Ratio Decidendi: Appeals falling below the applicable monetary limit prescribed under the Board's litigation policy are liable to be dismissed without adjudication on merits.