Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under Section 24 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 was barred by limitation or was validly initiated within the extended six-year period on the ground that the assessee had failed to disclose fully the particulars of its turnover.
Analysis: Section 24(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 permits reopening within six years where the dealer has concealed, omitted, or failed to disclose fully the particulars of turnover, and within four years in any other case. Rule 23A of the Delhi Sales Tax Rules, 1975 required disclosure of the purchase price of goods utilized for purposes other than those specified in the registration certificate. The return filed by the assessee did not disclose the purchase price of goods covered by statutory forms that were not used for the specified purpose, and the material on record showed non-disclosure of facts necessary for correct assessment. On that basis, the Tribunal and the authorities below were justified in treating the case as one of failure to disclose fully material particulars.
Conclusion: The reassessment was within the extended period of six years and was not time-barred. The objection based on limitation failed.