Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 42(2) applied where a resident assessee carried on ship-repair business with non-resident shipping companies, and the resident earned no profit because repairs were done at cost.
Analysis: Section 42(2) was construed as aimed at taxing the profits of a resident business in the taxable territories which would ordinarily yield profits but for a close connection with a non-resident. The essential requirements were identified as a resident carrying on business in the taxable territories, that business ordinarily yielding profits, business being carried on with a non-resident, and a close connection between them. The Court held that the provision did not require the non-resident to carry on the same business as the resident, nor even to carry on business in the taxable territories in the same sense. It was enough that the non-resident engaged in a sufficiently continuous business activity in relation to the resident, and the repairing of the ships was part of the non-residents' profit-making business because seaworthy ships were necessary for earning profits.
Conclusion: Section 42(2) applied on the facts, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 42(2) to apply, it is sufficient that a resident carrying on a profit-yielding business in the taxable territories does business with a non-resident with whom there is a close connection, even if the non-resident does not carry on the same business as the resident.