Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the items covered by the agreement dated 27 December 1960 were immovable property and, if so, whether the transaction gave rise to tax liability as profits under section 41(2) or as capital gains under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The expressions "immovable property" and "attached to earth" were read in the light of section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act and section 3(26) of the General Clauses Act. Property is immovable when it is rooted in the earth, embedded in the earth, or attached to what is so embedded for its permanent beneficial enjoyment. By contrast, an attachment made only for the beneficial enjoyment of the chattel itself does not alter its character as movables. On examining the articles described in the agreements, the Court found that they were permanently attached to the structures embedded in the earth and therefore fell within the concept of immovable property.
Conclusion: The items in question were immovable property, and the question referred was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods or articles permanently attached to something embedded in the earth for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of the property are immovable property, not chattels, for income-tax purposes.