Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether paneer and chena were excluded from Entry 40 of the exemption notification for milk and milk products, and whether the English and Hindi versions of the notification created any conflict affecting the exemption.
Analysis: Entry 40 exempted milk and milk products, but specifically excluded cheese. The notification was read in both English and Hindi versions, and the Court found no real conflict between them. On the materials before it, paneer was treated as a form of soft cheese, and chena when given shape was regarded as paneer. The earlier view that paneer falls within the excluded category of cheese was followed, and the Tribunal's approach treating chena and paneer as the same item was accepted.
Conclusion: Paneer and chena were held to be excluded from the exempted milk products under Entry 40, and the revision was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption entry excludes cheese, paneer as a form of soft cheese falls within the exclusion, and a merely linguistic difference between Hindi and English versions does not alter that substantive position when the intended meaning is clear.