Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disciplinary proceedings for recovery of pecuniary loss and adjustment of the amount against retiral benefits could be initiated and continued after the employee's superannuation, when the show cause notice and charge-sheet were issued on the last day of service.
Analysis: The proceedings were founded on alleged negligence causing financial loss to the employer and were covered by the service rules permitting recovery of pecuniary loss from pay or other amounts due to the employee. The show cause notice had been issued while the employee was in service, and the regular notice was also served on the last day of service. The mere fact of retirement did not extinguish the employer's right to proceed for recovery of loss from gratuity and other terminal dues. The Court further held that the High Court ought not to have interfered in writ jurisdiction where the action complained of was not without authority or jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The proceedings and the consequential recovery orders were not illegal merely because the employee had retired, and the High Court's quashing of them was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where service rules authorize recovery of pecuniary loss caused by an employee's negligence, proceedings initiated while the employee is still in service may continue after superannuation for adjustment against retiral benefits.