Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a respondent clearing inputs as such after reversing the Cenvat credit was liable to pay duty on the transaction value, or only to reverse the credit taken on such inputs.
Analysis: The respondent was not the manufacturer of the inputs and had merely cleared the inputs as such. Under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the liability in such a situation was confined to reversal of the credit already availed on those inputs. Since the credit had already been reversed, no further duty demand on transaction value could be sustained.
Conclusion: The respondent was not liable to pay duty on the transaction value and had discharged the only liability arising on clearance of inputs as such by reversing the Cenvat credit. The demand and penalty were unsustainable.