Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on delayed payment of central excise duty was leviable for the period prior to 11-05-2001 in view of Section 11AB(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: Section 11AB provides for levy of interest on delayed payment of duty, but sub-section (2) expressly excludes cases where the duty had become payable, or ought to have been paid, before the date on which the Finance Bill, 2001 received the assent of the President. The duty in question related to clearances made between July and October, 2000, and the demand for interest was also relatable to that period. On that basis, the statutory exclusion applied and interest was not recoverable under Section 11AB(2).
Conclusion: The demand of interest was not sustainable under Section 11AB(2) and the challenge by the Revenue failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal did not establish any basis for interference with the order deleting the interest demand, and the assessee's position was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not leviable for duty that became payable before 11-05-2001, because sub-section (2) excludes such pre-assent liabilities from the scope of sub-section (1).